Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Uniquely identifying each & every html template

by Nik
on Jan 21, 2013 at 15:24 UTC ( #1014461=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Uniquely identifying each & every html template
in thread Uniquely identifying each & every html template

Why there is a need to Convert the unique filename to a unique number? How is this gonna help?
The hash is a mathematical algorithm of producing a string based on a contents file BUT in my case i stated that:

the .html file can be:

1. renamed
2. moved
3. contents altered (hash is based on files contents, so that will fail)

We need some other attribute to identify a file because relying on the above attributes will only produce DOUBLE counters for the modifies file.


Comment on Re^2: Uniquely identifying each & every html template
Re^3: Uniquely identifying each & every html template
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Jan 21, 2013 at 16:15 UTC
    Why there is a need to Convert the unique filename to a unique number? How is this gonna help?

    Why are you asking me the same question as I asked you?

    The hash is a mathematical algorithm of producing a string based on a contents file

    I showed the hash operating on the file path, not its content.

    the .html file can be: 1. renamed 2. moved 3. contents altered

    Thus, you want to be able to consider two files with different names, different locations and different contents as "the same file".

    Without you arranging to place some piece of information within those files that can be searched for, to uniquely identify them; those criteria mean that any two files could be considered the same, which is a nonsense; which is why I ignored the possibility that you actually meant that; and assumed your description was lacking precision.

    However, inserting a piece of information -- say a custom html-like tag or html comment -- into each html file -- regardless of whether the are 100's 1000's or 100s of 1000s would be the works of a few minutes. At least it would be for Perl.


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
      those criteria mean that any two files could be considered the same, which is a nonsense; which is why I ignored the possibility that you actually meant that; and assumed your description was lacking precision.
      No, it is not a nonsense. Imagine me in real life:

      1. i'am altering my real name
      2. i'am changing the location of where i live
      3. i face lift myself.

      Am i not still the same person i used to be?
      However, inserting a piece of information -- say a custom html-like tag or html comment -- into each html file -- regardless of whether the are 100's 1000's or 100s of 1000s would be the works of a few minutes. At least it would be for Perl.
      And what if the .html page gets rewritten by DreamWeaver or Joomla and the certain piece of information is overwwitten, thus gets lost?

        Am i not still the same person i used to be?

        Perhaps.

        Upon being presented with an award by the council for saving money by using the same broom for 20 years, a character in a famous British sitcom said:

        And that's what I've done. Maintained it for 20 years. This old broom's had 17 new heads and 14 new handles in its time.

        To which the inevitable response is, how the hell can it be the same bloody broom then?

        This is an ancient question, best known as Theseus' paradox.

        Most of the cells in your body aren't much more than a few years old. (Some are in it for the long haul - after adolescence we don't grow many more brain cells for example - we just start putting them to better use!) So are you the same person that you were 10 years ago?

        If you think you are, what makes you the same person? What has been the constant factor that you can point to over the last ten years that allows you to consider yourself to be a continuation of the same person?

        Now, to more practical matters, what constant factor can you point to over file changes that allows you to consider two files to be the same file? Write an algorithm to detect that factor. Job done.

        package Cow { use Moo; has name => (is => 'lazy', default => sub { 'Mooington' }) } say Cow->new->name
        Am i not still the same person i used to be?

        Has your DNA changed? If not, you are detectably the same person.

        So now all you need is something to detect in your files to make the determination.

        But if Dreamweaver glitches and empties the file, you're stuffed.


        With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1014461]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-07-31 15:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (249 votes), past polls