Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much

Re^2: regex anchoring issue

by smls (Friar)
on Feb 15, 2013 at 11:23 UTC ( #1018879=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: regex anchoring issue
in thread regex anchoring issue

Why do you place the regex in a (?>...) non-backtracking group?

Comment on Re^2: regex anchoring issue
Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: regex anchoring issue
by kcott (Canon) on Feb 16, 2013 at 05:58 UTC

    Wrapping regexp alternations in (?>...) is something I do by default. While there may be rare cases where this might be problematical, I haven't encountered any: it's something that doesn't hurt and, indeed, often helps.

    This usage is based on a "Perl Best Practices" guideline: Backtracking (page 269). It's summarised on page 271 as:

    ... rewrite any instance of:

    X | Y


    (?> X | Y )

    While I'm not a slave to all "Perl Best Practices" guidelines, this is one I have found to be useful.

    Update: s/have encountered/haven't encountered/

    -- Ken

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1018879]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (2)
As of 2015-10-09 04:22 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (233 votes), past polls