Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Perl semi-object without a constructor

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on Feb 21, 2013 at 14:50 UTC ( #1019955=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl semi-object without a constructor

Let me try to toss-in an explanation of the big picture here:

(1)   In Perl, an “object” is (usually...) a hashref that has been passed to the built-in function, bless, which takes as its (usually...) two parameters the hashref to be blessed and a package name.   Internally, Perl now flips a switch that says that it is “blessed,” and associates the specified package-name with it.   (Yes, it can be, and occasionally is, re-blessed, which changes the associated package-name.)

Any piece of code which serves this function, no matter where it is located nor what it is named, serves this purpose.   Specifically, there is nothing “magical” about a function named new.


(2)   When something has been blessed, it becomes possible to use the $obj->methodname(args...) syntax.   This simply translates to a subroutine call, to a sub (maybe...) found in the previously-associated package, but passing $obj as an additional, first, parameter.

You will therefore find that these subroutines begin with a statement such as my $self = shift;, which grabs that first-parameter that has been added.   Once again, the name $self is simply a convention.


HTH...   If you are used to looking at very formal, computer-science-y language implementations, you might be a bit startled by Perl.


Comment on Re: Perl semi-object without a constructor

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1019955]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2015-07-29 08:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (261 votes), past polls