Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: why "link", "rename", but no "unlink" in CORE::?

by Anonymous Monk
on Feb 27, 2013 at 11:48 UTC ( #1020858=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to why "link", "rename", but no "unlink" in CORE::?

I would look at ex::override

  • Comment on Re: why "link", "rename", but no "unlink" in CORE::?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: why "link", "rename", but no "unlink" in CORE::?
by perl-diddler (Hermit) on Feb 27, 2013 at 20:26 UTC
    Indeed.

    That might be a cleaner way to do the same, though not sure if it will solve the problem of allowing a direct call or not until I try it (i.e. if I can't call unlink directly, it might not let me override it either? Dunno).

    Thanks for the tip.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1020858]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (3)
As of 2016-06-26 22:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My preferred method of making French fries (chips) is in a ...











    Results (331 votes). Check out past polls.