Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^6: Threads and signals in Windows

by bojinlund (Curate)
on Mar 11, 2013 at 23:04 UTC ( #1022891=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^5: Threads and signals in Windows
in thread Threads and signals in Windows

So you're just taking BrowserUk's word for it?

No, but I do not have enough knowledge in the Windows operating system and the Perl implementation on it to make such a statement!

Did you read perlport#fork yourself?

Yes!

In this patch http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/bee96257ad6e12bd0adacaeb3b40c32c5776b068?hp=2fbb14a0b50722f55cd2863203a1ea1a3c2133f7 I succeed to add some information on “Portability issues” to perlfunc. In perlfunc there is now very short information on some security issues, a link to perlport and in perlport a link to perlfork

I have later realized that this is not enough. For me it is very difficult to interpret the consequence of the information in perlfork.

I would like, already in perlfunc, to have more straightforward statements like:

“do not attempt to use fork & the windows signals emulation to try to port *nix idioms to windows; because you will be sadly let down”
or
“If you want to write cross-platform code, you shouldn't use signals, full stop.”
(The statements should of course be polished. I hope somebody with English as native language could help out.)


Comment on Re^6: Threads and signals in Windows

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1022891]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-07-29 12:52 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (217 votes), past polls