Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

by dsheroh (Parson)
on Mar 19, 2013 at 10:30 UTC ( #1024250=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

Wow, has it been six months already?

The monks soundly rejected your proposal to dump Anonymous Monk the last time you brought it up.

The monks soundly rejected your proposal to dump Anonymous Monk the time before that.

I think it's a pretty safe bet that we're going to reject it this time, too. And the next time. And the time after that. And however many more times it takes to finally get it through your thick skull that No, the community of PerlMonks at large does not agree with you that Anonymous Monk should be removed.


Comment on Re: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?
Re^2: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 19, 2013 at 13:34 UTC

    Reminds me of Quebec, except with near-unanimous vote every time.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1024250]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-07-26 17:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (178 votes), past polls