Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

t/Plack-Middleware/cgibin.t Attempt to free unreferenced scalar: SV 0x16a06d4, Perl interpreter: 0x118600c at Plack-1.0018\blib\lib/Plack/App/WrapCGI.pm line 48

by Anonymous Monk
on Mar 20, 2013 at 08:45 UTC ( #1024480=perlquestion: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
Anonymous Monk has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

I'm on win32 using citrusperl v5.16.1 and I get failure for Plack-1.0018/t/Plack-Middleware/cgibin.t

Attempt to free unreferenced scalar: SV 0x16a06d4, Perl interpreter: 0x118600c at Plack-1.0018\blib\lib/Plack/App/WrapCGI.pm line 48

Any other win32 folks get this?

FWIW, WrapCGI.pm:48 is  exec($script) or Carp::croak("cannot exec: $!"); , if I comment that out the failure moves to CGI::Compile line 33 which is a call to CORE::exit

update: happens with v5.14.1 also


Maybe related
kinda fix #109718: fork.t fails on Win32 since v5.15.4-465-g676a678
design problem #89142: On Win32 setting any encoding on STD(IN|OUT|ERR) with binmode causes subsequent fork calls to crash perl
resolved #88840: t/op/fork.t blocks in external process test on Win32
open #65136: (fork + socketpair) x 2 doesn't work under Windows, works under Linux
open #65134: (fork + pipe + pipe) x 2 doesn't work under Windows, works under Linux

Comment on t/Plack-Middleware/cgibin.t Attempt to free unreferenced scalar: SV 0x16a06d4, Perl interpreter: 0x118600c at Plack-1.0018\blib\lib/Plack/App/WrapCGI.pm line 48
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perlquestion [id://1024480]
Approved by Corion
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (18)
As of 2015-07-07 17:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (92 votes), past polls