|
|
|
| No such thing as a small change | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: What do you think about "Thank you"-nodes?by BrowserUk (Pope) |
| on Mar 22, 2013 at 09:50 UTC ( #1024903=note: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
The "only" information they have is valuable to the one who was so kind to take his time helping me. I disagree. They often also indicate which of many replies the OP found most useful/helpful/correct. Which is often just as perl related as the questions. Do you feel disturbed by these "Thank-you-nodes"? No. I'm happy to see them, for others replies; happy to receive them for my own replies; and happy to post them for good replies to my own questions. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||