http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1025220


in reply to Re^3: Once again . ..{blah} (Counter proposal: )
in thread Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk?

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Once again . ..{blah} (Counter proposal: )
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 25, 2013 at 02:19 UTC
    I'm the guy that is still here, more than 12 years later, after having been slandered, visciously lied about, ripped into, and pathetically shunned by half the ceebee and a whole host of former monks who are long gone. ad hominum is an epithet to throw like a stone for little Internet egotists.

    Yes. The same pathetic loser who has made just 196 posts in the those 12 years; of which 60%+ are pointless, misdirected, assertions that your opinion should for some reason outweight those of everyone else; rather than any attempts to help anyone or learn anything. Just like your vacuous diatribe in this thread.

    Your agenda is writ large all over your home node; so this meaningless, disconnected, out-of-touch wobbling of your gums comes as neither surprise nor interest.

    Ciao.

    Be well.


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Re^5: Once again . ..{blah} (Counter proposal: )
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 25, 2013 at 12:17 UTC
    "I'm the guy that is still here, more than 12 years later, after having been slandered, visciously sic lied about, ripped into, and pathetically shunned by half the ceebee and a whole host of former monks who are long gone"

    Zero evidence provided, yet you constantly berate others for omitting this. Also, spelling.