Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Safe wrapper for user regex?

by ww (Bishop)
on Mar 26, 2013 at 16:08 UTC ( #1025550=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Safe wrapper for user regex?

Are you unconcerned with the likes of rm -rf.... and dozens of other system and/or utility commands? I need a clearer sesnse of your goal.


If you didn't program your executable by toggling in binary, it wasn't really programming!


Comment on Re: Safe wrapper for user regex?
Download Code
Re^2: Safe wrapper for user regex?
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 26, 2013 at 16:43 UTC

    Are you unconcerned with the likes of rm -rf....

    That is kind of what Safe prevents

      True. My oversight... so ++ for taking the time to point that out. Thank you. However, my entire answer sort of failed to even hint at what should, perhaps, have been my point, which is (no frills): "It's often better to think about what to allow, and permit only that set, rather than trying to tin-over all the rat holes."

      If you didn't program your executable by toggling in binary, it wasn't really programming!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1025550]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-07-29 05:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (211 votes), past polls