Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: How many man-hours would you estimate you have invested in learning Perl?

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Apr 11, 2013 at 08:56 UTC ( #1028097=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: How many man-hours would you estimate you have invested in learning Perl?
in thread How many man-hours would you estimate you have invested in learning Perl?

I think I understood you. Please correct me where I have not.

Stated more simply, you inferred sexism where it could not exist and without consultation voiced that unfounded charge in a public forum.

Later in the thread you inferred homophobia and voiced the charge, again without foundation, publicly.

Those two combined open up a third possibility, defined in European and other legal doctrines as 'hate mongering'.

I strongly suggest that you stop now and seek both salient education and appropriate legal advice.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.


Comment on Re^4: How many man-hours would you estimate you have invested in learning Perl?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: How many man-hours would you estimate you have invested in learning Perl?
by pemungkah (Priest) on Apr 11, 2013 at 21:57 UTC
    You are repeatedly falsely accusing me of doing something that did not happen.

    I speak with precision. I said I was "waiting to see". That means I do not know whether something will happen or not. You might stretch and say I thought it was likely. But I said nothing about whatever poster was hiding behind the mask of the Anonymous Monk.

    If you think you know what I was thinking, you have a complete right to say, "I think that you think the poster is a homophobe."

    But you do not get to tell me I said something when I did not say it.

      You are repeatedly falsely accusing

      Pot. Kettle. Now stop.

        No. I will not walk away from you making a baseless allegation. I think you are very far out of line here. I directly quoted and explained what I said and you blew me off with a false equivalence.

        You are claiming that your assertion without evidence is the equivalent of my direct quote. If you have a direct quote, then let's see it and hear it. Otherwise you are making baseless statements meant to damage my reputation, and those totally are actionable.

        I think you have gone way past acceptable and ignorable. I believe you owe me an apology.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1028097]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (15)
As of 2015-07-31 16:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (279 votes), past polls