Others may find your posting understandable. I don't. Please clarify:
By what sort of decision chain/data testing do we get to an output for gene a.... that includes gene_A sample_2 when there is no gene_A sample_2 in the original data? I infer that it is not because the original data has two geneA... entities because the geneC sample...< /c> data do <b>NOT>/b> include 3 distinct data points to justify the<c> gene_C sample_3 output.
Minor update, mostly to offset data citations more clearly
If you didn't program your executable by toggling in binary, it wasn't really programming!