Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^5: Try::Tiny catch block with $_ eq ''

by vsespb (Chaplain)
on May 17, 2013 at 12:38 UTC ( #1033967=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: Try::Tiny catch block with $_ eq ''
in thread Try::Tiny catch block with $_ eq ''

It is possible to throw an exception which is considered false in a boolean context
Don't use
if ($@)
unless defined eval { somecode(); 1; }
If a DESTROY method calls eval then an object used within your eval could potentially clobber $@.
True, well, I count it as nesting evals.


I am not trying to tell that eval is better than Try::Tiny. I just think that OP might want to temporary change one statement to see how it works with plain eval{}.

For cases when people use nested exceptions try/catch blocks, heavy use Exception handling pattern, heavy use OOP (with descructors), Try::Tiny is much better than eval{} (it's impossible to work with eval actually)

But there are valid cases when people don't need to use Exceptions/OOP in so heavy way. Then it's perfectly valid to simply use eval then. And learning eval gotchas is as hard as learning Try::Tiny gotchas.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1033967]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-02-24 16:47 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When it is dark outside I am happiest to see ...

    Results (310 votes). Check out past polls.