Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Why upgrade perl?

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on May 21, 2013 at 20:10 UTC ( #1034600=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Why upgrade perl?
in thread Why upgrade perl?

I am frankly quite intrigued why you say, “overstating the case,” because I certainly have encountered incompatibility issues on a great many upgrades.   And, given that RedHat’s most-essential software tools run on Perl, that does become a serious concern.   I am not challenging your POV, but it does surprise me to hear this.


Comment on Re^3: Why upgrade perl?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Why upgrade perl?
by marto (Bishop) on May 22, 2013 at 10:15 UTC

    "And, given that RedHat’s most-essential software tools run on Perl, that does become a serious concern."

    Leaving the system Perl to the system is wise. Let the vendor do what they want, it's trivial to install your own Perl elsewhere.

Re^4: Why upgrade perl?
by dsheroh (Parson) on May 22, 2013 at 10:11 UTC
    I feel that it's an overstatement to say that a too-old version of perl will "often" cause problems when installing CPAN modules, given my own experience that such problems are extremely rare, with the one exception of pre-5.10 perl vs. post-5.10 modules. It's interesting to see that your experience has been the opposite and that makes me wonder which is actually the more common set of experiences.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1034600]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-07-29 09:50 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (263 votes), past polls