in reply to
Re: Thoughts on replacing -> with .
in thread Thoughts on replacing -> with .
Note that =~ and ~= are both valid Perl already.
Hmm, I don’t see ~= in perlop; and ~ is the unary bitwise negation operator, so it wouldn’t make much sense to have ~=. What is it?
It is like += and .=, which modify the left-hand side by the right hand side.
$a += $b adds the right hand side ($b) to the left hand side, $a, and assigns the result to $a.
$a .= $b appends $b to $a and assigns the result to $a.
$a ~= $b xor's $b and $a and assigns the result to $a.
As this is a relatively uncommon use, it maybe makes this interchange currently even harder to spot than later the use of =~ and ~=.
$a ~= $b
But XOR-assign is supposed to be $a ^= $b...
Use subroutines for code reuse
Master regular expressions
Write my GUIs with Perl
Abandon CGI in favor of some modern web framework
Put my code in modules
Create CPAN distributions
test and document my code as I write it
Write OOP with or without animal help
Finally switch to a modern Perl style
Create a killer application with Perl
Detoxify from Perl and PerlMonks
Choose another language because Perl is dead
Learn to program for mobile devices
Complete my secret world domination project
None, because the road to hell is paved with good intentions
Results (197 votes),