Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: socket server threads or fork

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Jun 18, 2013 at 17:40 UTC ( #1039611=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to socket server threads or fork

I think the best option is use fork for starting new process by each connection because what I need is performance and I don't need to share info between the established connections.

If you are on *nix, use fork; if you are on Windows, use threads. If you need to run anywhere perl does, use the latter.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.


Comment on Re: socket server threads or fork

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1039611]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-10-02 09:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    What is your favourite meta-syntactic variable name?














    Results (52 votes), past polls