Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical

Re: socket server threads or fork

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Jun 18, 2013 at 17:40 UTC ( #1039611=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to socket server threads or fork

I think the best option is use fork for starting new process by each connection because what I need is performance and I don't need to share info between the established connections.

If you are on *nix, use fork; if you are on Windows, use threads. If you need to run anywhere perl does, use the latter.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re: socket server threads or fork

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1039611]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-11-28 17:05 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (743 votes), past polls