in reply to Re^2: [Community] Perl Mongers mailing list problems (AnoPolice)in thread [Community] Perl Mongers mailing list problems
You have a name², you deserve an answer! =)
Before posting I discussed on CB which category to chose.
We have a lot of PerlMonk community discussions on MonkDiscuss, so PerlMonger community discussions didn't seem too far away.
(Clearly a category "Community"¹ would be nice to discuss things from the eco-sphere, I think it's a grey zone - maybe intentionally - left open)
Others on CB proposed other categories, but all felt less appropriate too me... and I took a decision.
But I left it open to my fellow monks to switch category by "moderation" before approving it.
So if you or any other (named) monk with appropriate XPs feel the need, plz just move/consider this thread ...
In the end, a "Which category does this thread belong to?" question would have been posted in MonkDiscuss... =)
( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)
¹) IMHO it's a pity that davido feels the need to apologize for promoting his group.
²) If a monk has the freedom to stay anonymous, I have the freedom to ignore him.
.desrever si txet eritne ehT
.backwards are (letters the not but) words the Only
ehT sdrow era ni redro, tub eht srettel era eht rehto yaw.
Who ndees baacdkrws wehn you have Tceilmopgyya?
?wdors reeersvd up meixd about How
.tusnnmihep rof nuttolg a m'I
Results (438 votes). Check out past polls.