|Problems? Is your data what you think it is?|
Re^8: Finding repeat sequences.by DamianConway (Beadle)
|on Jun 21, 2013 at 02:03 UTC||Need Help??|
So you try to predict the future; ie, guess.
No. I simply try to develop coding habits that make the inherently unpredictable nature of the future less error-prone and less fraught. Basing those habits on repeated patterns of behaviour and outcome I have identified from observing the past.I'm very firmly of the opinion -- based on my years of experience -- that premature generalisation has cost this industry far more, in both financial and in terms of its reputation for spending a fortune developing huge, all encompassing, singing & dancing solutions that never work, and quietly or otherwise, just end up in the bit bucket; than premature optimisation ever has or ever will.
I'm sure you're right. But you seem to be berating me for something I neither suggested nor advocate.
It didn't prefer the regex solution because it was already more generalized; I preferred it because it was more descriptive (to me), less error-prone (for me), and easier to rework or enhance (by me) should that eventually become necessary.
And I definitely wasn't suggesting premature optimization. After all, I'm not the one who would:
...willingly and knowingly trade the near 3 orders of magnitude performance gain for that task now, against any potential savings against potential future maintenance costs.
I was merely saying that I believe that code maintainability is generally more important than code performance. Which is why I still prefer the regex-based solution, even through it's three orders of magnitude slower.
I doubt we're ever going to agree on this...which is fine. But I'm certainly not going to apologize for making maintainability my own higher priority, nor for advocating it as a priority for most developers.Damian