Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: v5, a reimplementation of P5 (was Re^5: A "Perl-7" that I could actually USE right now)

by raiph (Hermit)
on Jul 02, 2013 at 04:03 UTC ( #1041949=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: v5, a reimplementation of P5 (was Re^5: A "Perl-7" that I could actually USE right now)
in thread A "Perl-7" that I could actually USE right now

Yes, my understanding is also that XS support is vitally important for the vast majority of legacy and contemporary uses of P5, even one-liners.

The future is very hard to predict, but I'd guess that this general picture is likely to continue for the next decade. That said, I think v5 on Android, and custom v5 slangs, eg one making multicore processing convenient, might start to shift things.

The P6 strategy has long been to support multiple bridges between P5 and P6, including both v5 and a libperl+XS bridge. See my recent Perl 6 <-> Perl 5 bridges PerlMonks comment for a few more details.

I agree with your emphasis on technical concerns and that's generally my focus.

However, we're all irrational creatures at heart and that seems to be particularly relevant in your case. Your continual disparagement of Larry Wall and those working with him ("I'm sure it's a fun experiment for the author") and what I see as wilful twisting of the P6 viewpoint (everywhere I've ever looked in the 13 years of the P6 project, the importance of CPAN and XS has been explicitly consistently recognized) suggests to me that you are either angry or contemptuous or both. I don't want anyone to be constantly angry or contemptuous about anything and especially not when it's directed towards Larry Wall and folk working for the betterment of Perl. So I spend time imagining about how you might feel so I might find a way to avoid triggering you. If there is not some underlying wound, please, please imagine how Larry Wall feels when you're considering what to write.


Comment on Re^4: v5, a reimplementation of P5 (was Re^5: A "Perl-7" that I could actually USE right now)
Re^5: v5, a reimplementation of P5 (was Re^5: A "Perl-7" that I could actually USE right now)
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Jul 02, 2013 at 04:58 UTC

    Thanks for the lecture.

    (I'm not the only person who stopped contributing. A healthier project, I believe, would try to figure out why that is.)

    I spent nine years of my volunteer time working on various parts of P6 and Parrot, and I spent most of that time doing the unfun things that no one else really wanted to do, like fixing segfaults, plugging memory leaks, profiling performance problems, and even fixing performance problems. I did all of that because I wanted to use Perl 6 for real work.

    When Rakudo Star finally came out, it wasn't usable for real work. I had a list of specific technical limitations (and none of them were "it's too slow" or "it only runs on Parrot"). To this day, Rakudo has addressed none of them. The last time I tried to explain them to #perl6, no one even wanted to hear them. That's fine; I eventually realize when no one cares about what I care about.

    Volunteers will do what volunteers will do (though I'm not sure you can entirely characterize someone who's taking grant money from TPF as a volunteer), but to my mind their efforts still have not produced the useful and usable subset of Perl 6 they promised three years ago. The last time I cared to look, they were still chasing rainbows instead of writing documentation or making sure their installer works or keeping community-contributed modules passing tests. It's nice that they're having fun. I'm sure they have only the best intentions, but real artists ship.

    Many other people could have done what I did, but if you take away the couple of thousand commits I checked in or the design changes I helped to produce over the several thousand hours I spent on it all, P6 wouldn't look like it does today. If, in your eyes, even that doesn't earn me the right to criticize a project that still hasn't released anything that I can use productively today, then that's your problem—not mine.

    Now go ahead, whine that my negativity is discouraging potential contributors—because you're so certain that that must be the real problem.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1041949]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-09-17 00:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (54 votes), past polls