Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Anti-Spam: Quarantine section?

by Riales (Hermit)
on Jul 09, 2013 at 00:24 UTC ( #1043209=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Anti-Spam: Quarantine section?
in thread Anti-Spam: Quarantine section?

It seems really tough to make a system like that that couldn't be abused, however.

As long as we're pipe-dreaming, some sort of AI that can accurately identify spam without human input would be even cooler! I would think that Google already has some rudimentary form of this...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1043209]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: if you have a jpeg data: or as wise Corion said IM ca n read directly your handle
[Corion]: Meh. I get the feeling I should post a call-to-action for people to test their modules with the upcoming 5.26 (or 5.25.latest), as it seems that the smoke testers don't really weed out modules that fail without . in @INC
[Corion]: But without instructions on how to easily test things yourself, I don't think such a call to arms is helpful
[Corion]: (this post on nntp.perl.org / p5p makes it seem to me that smoke testers seem to have a blind spot there)
[Corion]: Hmmm. Maybe setting $ENV{PERL5LIB}=" some path without dot"; perl Makefile.PL; make test already is enough to locally test your module...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-03-27 08:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (317 votes). Check out past polls.