Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Better way to define global variables

by davies (Parson)
on Jul 25, 2013 at 14:28 UTC ( #1046355=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Better way to define global variables

If you are using global variables, this can cause problems unless you're sure what you are doing. I frequently do for things that genuinely are global, like an instance of Excel, but almost always I want them to be WORMs (write once, read many). When I ran into a similar problem, BrowserUK gave me some very helpful advice at Re^7: Strict isn't strict enough. I don't know how much use the rest of the thread will be to you, but tobyink's suggestion at Re^2: Strict isn't strict enough (stop it) and Tye's at Re^3: Strict isn't strict enough (stop it) might also be relevant to your situation.


John Davies

  • Comment on Re: Better way to define global variables

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1046355]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-05-26 18:36 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?