Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation?

by Zarabozo (Acolyte)
on Aug 24, 2013 at 01:25 UTC ( #1050748=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation?
in thread Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation?

...or, I have 24'' LCD monitors with a resolution of 1920 * 1200 pixels, placed at a decent distance. The point being, I generally don't need to do that with other websites that present code-formated blocks. For example, I find Stack Overflow very pleasant to read.
  • Comment on Re^2: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Why is PerlMonks.org still so ugly and outdated on presentation?
by swampyankee (Parson) on Aug 27, 2013 at 04:28 UTC

    I have a 13 in (33 cm) 1280 by 800 monitor at a decent distance (a bit less than arm's length), wear bifocals, and, oddly, don't have any problems. It also doesn't waste my time with Flash, animations, or such nonsense.


    Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting. — emc

      I have a 13 [...] and, oddly, don't have any problems.

      And you have the "Large code font" option turned on. Anonymous Monk didn't have that option. (It still isn't an option, but a few days ago I unconditionally enabled it for anonymonk.)

      - tye        

        \o/. Thanks, tye.

        I do use my own CSS to bend the layout to my tastes. That is however not possible on a 'puter that I cannot control or a user agent is not as accommodating as Opera (desktop; presto). All in all, that was a welcome change.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1050748]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: php does not suck anymore?
[ambrus]: Discipulus: I'm not sure, but it certainly doesn't suck as much as it's used to. it's like C++, it sucks because people still recursively learn from twenty year old PHP examples,
[ambrus]: and they try to use the obsolete features that PHP has to support only for compatibility with old scripts. C++ and PHP both have the problem that people can't forget the past, because when they google "PHP" plus the problme they want to solve, they find b
[ambrus]: ad code examples.
[ambrus]: I'm not trying to recommend PHP, but I think it has way too bad a name because of its past.
[ambrus]: This is different from MS Word, which was already a good editor in the pre-unicode days (in word for windows versions 2 and 6, which ran on windows 3 but also on windows 95), only it wasn't trying to solve the task of writing maths papers back then.
[Discipulus]: ah ok, sounds reasonable; with no fear: Perl all life long
[ambrus]: Mind you, LaTeX is currently still useful for writing math paper or snippet content without styling in such a way that the
[ambrus]: formatting conventions of a journal or website can be quickly applied to it, and MS Office and LibreOffice has not quite solved this (although it's better for this than it used to be),
[ambrus]: which is sort of a drawback compared to the ages of typewritten manuscripts representing content only to which the typesetter applies formatting, but that process required much more manual labor.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-09-26 11:10 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:









    Results (293 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?