|laziness, impatience, and hubris|
Who gave (and continues to give) Tye McQueen his authority for his autocratic domination of PerlMonks?by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Sep 02, 2013 at 13:34 UTC||Need Help??|
PerlMonks is not a democracy. That I get; understand and even endorse. But ...
Autocracy, without wide -- if not universal -- acceptance of divine right; invites question, challenge, and even rebellion.
From whom does Tye inherit his authority?
Do they -- knowingly -- (continue) to cede authority to Tye or did he inherit his "authority" purely as an accident of those above named (former?) Gods, by dint of longevity alone?
And if so, should we -- collectively, the constant, responsive, backbone of PerlMonks - continue to accept his caprice over how, and why, and what, and when, happens and is possible, and should be acceptable, here at the Monastery?
Copy, amend to taste and and paste: Yes: [ ]; No: [ ]; Don't know: [ ]; Don't care: [ ]?
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.