Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: The Illusion of One-Offs

by footpad (Monsignor)
on Aug 16, 2001 at 20:59 UTC ( #105442=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The Illusion of One-Offs

Well, I wouldn't call this unpopular; I'd call it the natural evolution of a programmer learning to be pragmatic. The Three Virtues can be applied to any programming language, discipline, or environment. (They can even be applied to other forms of creative problem-solving.) After all, you just described Laziness in action.

I do disagree with the use of script, though probably for the same reasons you avoid it. After all, would you call Javascript rollovers a program? They certainly require the same sort of research, discipline, and testing that "programs" do, but I think you'd run into a certain amount of resistance from others (generally non-IT people) if you insisted on calling them programs. (Indeed, I think the general response might be "What-ever.") Similarly, certain folks insist on calling .CGI files "scripts" no matter how involved.

Now, that's not to say you can't think of them and treat them as programs. That's just discipline. My point being that you should think of them as whatever you want, but use terminology appropriate for your audience. There are few things more annoying (to me, at any rate) than folks who insist you adopt their mental model about something.

I realize you didn't do that and I'm not saying you do or did. I'm just pointing out that no matter what you personally think about something, you need to communicate with others that have different opinions and experiences. All too often, many holding strong ideas and opinions are not receptive to other points of view. I believe it's far wiser to hold your ideas and to allow others to hold theirs. (Who knows? They just might be onto something.) Thus, it seems wise to allow others to develop their own opinions and to adapt to those opinions as needed. Educate as needed; ignore as necessary. But never give up hope that others will learn from your successes and approaches. Similarly, you shouldn't be afraid to grow from someone else's ideas.

Speaking of learning from your successes, have you given thought to uploading selected bits from your library? Not only would you get feedback, but it's likely that others would find them useful, educational, and interesting. Perhaps not, but it shouldn't hurt.

And, finally, I do agree that there are far fewer "one-off's" than most people realize. Heck, I've even take code used to learn the behavior of a given feature and plopped it straight into a production app. You should always give a certain amount of thought toward the possibility of reuse. Don't carry it too far, but at least consider it.

--f


Comment on Re: The Illusion of One-Offs
Re: Re: The Illusion of One-Offs
by mrmick (Curate) on Aug 16, 2001 at 21:10 UTC
    footpad says:
    Speaking of learning from your successes, have you given thought to uploading selected bits from your library?

    I would really like to but they are mostly a collection of mandane little tasks that I'm simply too lazy to do over and over again. :-)

    Also, there are things in many of them that I would not be permitted to share with anyone outside the corporation. Therefore, I really don't own them. Non-disclosure agreements are definitely binding. :-)

    Mick

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://105442]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-21 21:35 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (108 votes), past polls