|Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister|
Re^7: I want you to convince me to learn Perlby BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Sep 25, 2013 at 14:57 UTC||Need Help??|
Don't good friends deserve a name?
Sorry. I see your smiley face, but I'm going to answer the question seriously: Absolutely frikkin' not :)
Why contrive a name for something that will never be called anywhere else?
Why contrive a name for a block of code that only makes sense in one place in the source?
That will often will only work in one place in the source because it needs access to lexical variables in scope at that position (closures). If you make the blocks named subroutines, then they have to be declared out-of-line of where they are used, which means you now need to pass (what would be) closures via arguments; and that means making up more names for the formals.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.