Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?

by vsespb (Hermit)
on Sep 30, 2013 at 16:54 UTC ( #1056389=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?
in thread Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?

Unless keys() can be switched to a test mode to produce predictable results (doesn't need to be sorted, just give me something predictable, like before perl 5.17), what are the options?
To test hash_serialize():

I would deserialize it to memory, and compare with original hash (with something based on "sort keys" or with cmp_deeply).

However this violates some ideas of unit testing (while it's ok for integration testing).
If it's worrying you - test it for 1-element hash and 2-elements hash (yes, all 2 permutations), and stop. Do other testing with deserialization.

To test other code, which uses hash_serialize():

mock (fake) hash_serialize().


Comment on Re^2: Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1056389]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-12-18 11:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (50 votes), past polls