http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1057339


in reply to Re^3: Perl & Unicode: state of the art?
in thread Perl & Unicode: state of the art?

You know the answer

Nope. If I knew, I wouldn't be asking.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
  • Comment on Re^4: Perl & Unicode: state of the art?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Perl & Unicode: state of the art?
by Discipulus (Canon) on Oct 08, 2013 at 07:32 UTC
    Well come back to Babel, brothers..

    Languages are live things, poetry is a valid form of a language.

    Processors are mechanicals things: no way to cover all the cases.

    Perl is digital and my brain is analogical.

    no hope, sorry
    there are no rules, there are no thumbs..