Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: treat pairs, set as one item: looking for better way

by remiah (Hermit)
on Oct 19, 2013 at 11:58 UTC ( #1058905=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: treat pairs, set as one item: looking for better way
in thread treat pairs, set as one item: looking for better way

Hello LanX ! and oh my god !!!

#!/usr/bin/perl use Graph::Undirected; use strict; use warnings; my $g = Graph::Undirected->new; my @key_array = 'a' .. 'z'; my @set_array = ( ['a', 'b'], ['e','f'], ['f','g'] ); $g->add_vertex( $_ ) for @key_array; $g->add_edge( $_->[0], $_->[1] ) for @set_array; print "$_\n" for sort { length($b) <=> length($a) || $a cmp $b } map {join( ',', @$_) } $g->connected_components;
I totally forgot about Graph module until you tell me.
I would like to read your pages you gave me.

Really thanks for your reply.


Comment on Re^2: treat pairs, set as one item: looking for better way
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1058905]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-07-06 01:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (68 votes), past polls