Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: search data structures using SQL

by einhverfr (Pilgrim)
on Nov 17, 2013 at 05:05 UTC ( #1062970=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: search data structures using SQL
in thread search data structures using SQL

If you are going to do that, why not just skip SQL, take what is good from SQL, and apply Perlisms to it?

I.e. instead of SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz is not true; why not come up with an SQL-inspired interface that avoids the parsing issues, something like:

select( columns => ['foo'], start_table => 'bar', condition => '? or !defined ?', bind => ['baz', 'baz'] );

This would avoid the parsing problems, allow you to add joins, cte's, inline views, and more if you ever need it. It would avoid the hard problems while giving you something where you and your successor could leverage sql knowledge. That means essentially passing in the parse tree rather than the declarative statement to the function, and as such it also avoids the possibility of sql injection.


Comment on Re^3: search data structures using SQL
Download Code
Re^4: search data structures using SQL
by jdporter (Canon) on Nov 18, 2013 at 02:03 UTC

    Good point; but it's not the interface I care about. I'm not insisting that it be SQL. What I'm looking for is a replacement for the bletcherous blob of an engine I wrote. I assume (yeah, I know) that an engine that implements an SQL interface will be able to do what I want. If I can get the engine without the SQL, that's fine too.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1062970]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-10-23 00:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (122 votes), past polls