Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Can you make it nicer?

by choroba (Abbot)
on Nov 19, 2013 at 10:58 UTC ( #1063309=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Can you make it nicer?
in thread Can you make it nicer?

Let me disagree, even if the original code was not the worst example I could have brought up.

  1. I was staring at the code for a long time before I understood what it does (originally, there was inconsistent indentation, global variables with meaningless names, almost no whitespace). I had to run it to see whether the numeric constants were correct and what the behaviour was for larger numbers.
  2. Here I have to agree. I was not satisfied with my solution, that was why I asked here. To run an exhaustive test, you can modify the list to
    q(), 0 .. 1e12
    Reserve enough time, though.
  3. Business justification: I am the maintainer of the code. If the code changes only when fixing bugs, it will stay in the nineties and become unmaintainable. Without refactoring, the code becomes dead, and accumulates risk: at one point in the future, a bug or feature request will appear that will not be possible.

    Working with always enough assigned tickets to prevent any creativity leads to exhaustion. It will make me leave your company, which means «business cost»: you invested in the hiring process and in training me. Moreover, trust (both to expert opinions and business decisions) makes the working environment better.

لսႽ ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ


Comment on Re^2: Can you make it nicer?
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1063309]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-07-26 08:35 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (175 votes), past polls