Re^4: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments

in reply to Re^3: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments
in thread Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments

Silly. speed is not the goal of perl, for this we have C and inline::c... the sooner you realize this the sooner you will stop trying to make using Inline::C easier

Its almost as if you don't want Will the Chill to use Inline::C for speed

Comment on Re^4: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by Will_the_Chill (Pilgrim) on Nov 23, 2013 at 20:20 UTC
Anonymous Monk is correct, RPerl directly utilizes Inline::C and Inline::CPP to achieve runtime optimization.	[reply]
Re^6: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by vkon (Curate) on Nov 23, 2013 at 20:24 UTC
he isn.t... i said nothing about you using inline:: c and c in rperl... go reread	[reply]
Re^5: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by vkon (Curate) on Nov 23, 2013 at 20:22 UTC
you swapped my sentences and words, and then speculating about this changed content... i hereby announce your broken quote of my text as not containing mine thoughts and thus declare your reply invalid... dixi	[reply]
Re^6: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by Anonymous Monk on Nov 24, 2013 at 01:05 UTC
1+2=3; 2+1=3; 1+1+1=3; vkon non sequitur	[reply]
Re^7: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by vkon (Curate) on Nov 24, 2013 at 16:01 UTC
what does this mean? Looks like garbage.... give me a favour - pleae do not bother distracting me with your meaningless replies	[reply]
Re^8: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by Anonymous Monk on Nov 24, 2013 at 16:55 UTC
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Meditations