Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Dec 13, 2013 at 16:22 UTC ( #1067038=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?
in thread A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?

That'll do nicely. Thank you.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.


Comment on Re^2: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?
Re^3: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?
by greengaroo (Hermit) on Dec 16, 2013 at 16:13 UTC

    Why not this:

    for ( @a ) { ++$_; $_ %= 10 }

    And if you really want to process only the first 10, you can still use the slice:

    for ( @a[0..9] ) { ++$_; $_ %= 10 }


    A for will get you from A to Z; a while will get you everywhere.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1067038]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-07-05 22:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (68 votes), past polls