|Syntactic Confectionery Delight|
Re^2: Autoboxing ... "Yes We Can" ( or how I learned to love TIMTOWTDI ;)by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Dec 14, 2013 at 10:36 UTC||Need Help??|
First consider, how does eschewing all the possible operator syntaxes -- prefix, postfix, infix, circumfix -- along with all precedence; in favour of a single operator syntax, increase flexibility?
Then read How non-member functions improve encapsulation in full. Then note the author.
Then consider how the ability to call any function as a "method" of any random variable -- regardless of anything -- will play amongst the Duck typing is no typing crowd.
And I'm far from excited. I'm bored to see this being raked over again; especially upon such scant & broken reasoning.
There is simply no reason to lose one's cool in order to counter such illogicality.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.