Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?

Re^3: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?

by greengaroo (Hermit)
on Dec 16, 2013 at 16:13 UTC ( #1067351=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?
in thread A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?

Why not this:

for ( @a ) { ++$_; $_ %= 10 }

And if you really want to process only the first 10, you can still use the slice:

for ( @a[0..9] ) { ++$_; $_ %= 10 }

A for will get you from A to Z; a while will get you everywhere.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1067351]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2016-10-27 07:09 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (353 votes). Check out past polls.