Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?

by greengaroo (Hermit)
on Dec 16, 2013 at 16:13 UTC ( #1067351=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?
in thread A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?

Why not this:

for ( @a ) { ++$_; $_ %= 10 }

And if you really want to process only the first 10, you can still use the slice:

for ( @a[0..9] ) { ++$_; $_ %= 10 }


A for will get you from A to Z; a while will get you everywhere.


Comment on Re^3: A better (ie.more concise) way to write this?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1067351]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-21 15:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (106 votes), past polls