Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?)

by LanX (Canon)
on Dec 23, 2013 at 16:47 UTC ( #1068217=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?)
in thread Travelling problem

And what have you "proven" so far except dropping numbers and (most probably) miscalculating the lower bound?

Cheers Rolf

( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)


Comment on Re^5: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?)
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?)
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Dec 23, 2013 at 17:17 UTC
    except dropping numbers

    Check it yourself:

    86850 [ 0 5 13 22 8 3 12 20 16 11 6 1 10 15 7 18 2 19 17 14 4 9 21 23 +]

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Re^6: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?)
by tangent (Curate) on Dec 23, 2013 at 17:43 UTC
    Or even:
    85923 [1,2,11,16,7,8,12,17,21,6,13,4,9,23,14,10,22,15,5,18,20,3,19,24]

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1068217]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-29 10:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (263 votes), past polls