Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Bareword "threads::joinable" not allowed while "strict subs" in use

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Dec 27, 2013 at 10:09 UTC ( #1068494=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Bareword "threads::joinable" not allowed while "strict subs" in use
in thread Bareword "threads::joinable" not allowed while "strict subs" in use

This must be new code otherwise you wouldn't only now be discovering that threads::joinable isn't available.

So, why not install a new version in parallel and run your new code on that?


Your sample code does nothing useful, so I cannot safely advise how to re-write it so that you do not need joinable; but if your threads are not returning anything, why join them at all?

You could just detach them and let them go away naturally; but then you need to have a mechanism for deciding when your main thread can end.

Alternatively; why test for joinable? Most of the time you want to wait for them all to end; so a simple:

$_->join for @threads;

Is all that is required.

But again, given silly sample code, it is impossible to advise which strategy makes sense in your case.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.


Comment on Re^5: Bareword "threads::joinable" not allowed while "strict subs" in use
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1068494]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-07-23 14:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (144 votes), past polls