Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses

Re: Having our anonymous cake and eating it too

by talexb (Canon)
on Jan 23, 2014 at 14:39 UTC ( #1071762=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Having our anonymous cake and eating it too

Would an account option to hide Anonymous Monk posts be a possible solution? I'm still not sure what problem we're trying to solve here, but I thought I'd pass that idea along.

Like nodes below a set level (I think mine is 10), the AM posts might show up as collapsed blocks. Hmm .. but the replies to AM would still show through.

I don't mind AM posts myself, and have posted anonymously on occasion. :)

Alex / talexb / Toronto

Thanks PJ. We owe you so much. Groklaw -- RIP -- 2003 to 2013.

Comment on Re: Having our anonymous cake and eating it too
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Having our anonymous cake and eating it too
by pemungkah (Priest) on Jan 24, 2014 at 05:06 UTC
    I suggested in my reply to tye that maybe artificial downvotes associated with a per-user blocklist might be a cheap and easy way to do this. Threads just stop rendering with the "below your threshold" message when they hit someone in your blocklist; you're free to open up that link if you want to keep going.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1071762]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-11-25 04:17 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (670 votes), past polls