laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
Re: The future of Perl?by jellisii2 (Hermit) |
on Nov 10, 2014 at 14:03 UTC ( [id://1106701]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Please take this as observations from someone who probably isn't as deep in perl as many here. I know that BrowserUK, ww, sundialsvc4, Corion and many others have a MUCH larger body of knowledge concerning perl than I do. I do think perl does have a future, but it currently rests in very narrow verticals. Myself, I use it mostly for administrative tasks, though I have written other things (desktop and command line stuff for $work) in it as well. I find that perl is much easier to get things done on the machine with than bash/ksh/csh/flavor-of-the-decade-sh. Many sysadmins I know use perl extensively to get things done. I've almost completely foregone sh in lieu of perl. That said, I do think that there are some things that could improve traction outside of the narrow verticals:
All of the above said, in my narrow vertical I typically use perl for (administrative tasks), cluster management software is getting more and more useable. Salt is a REALLY REALLY powerful tool that's very usable. I don't think it has the capabilities of replacing perl outright for me, but it's making once hugely difficult stuff (multi-machine deployment and management) significantly easier. As these tools get more powerful, I do think that perl becomes far more niche, but I don't think it'll hit "dead" for quite some time.
In Section
Meditations
|
|