Re^12: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

Does your opinion outweigh everyone else's?

My opinion carries very little weight indeed. I'm not a god, I just document the realities as best I can. But having non-topical sections makes eminent sense to me, so I argue in favor of it. But you don't need to change my mind, you need to change the gods' minds; and if you succeed, I will update the site docs accordingly.

I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

Comment on Re^12: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^13: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 08, 2015 at 17:12 UTC
I'm not a god, Sorry. I do know that(). I'm simply using your readiness to respond and debate to put forth the arguments, in the hope that the 2 of 9 that do still come around might consider. Forlorn hope I know, but I'm ever the optimist. (despite that you are the most obvious choice to replace the 7 of 9 that never come around any more, you've been denied that privilege.) With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked	[reply]
Re^13: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by chacham (Prior) on Jun 10, 2015 at 13:29 UTC
I'm not a god Ah, memories, which have not changed. :)	[reply]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks