Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Almost 28 new names for 32 old marks

by jdporter (Paladin)
on Jun 12, 2015 at 16:09 UTC ( [id://1130217]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Almost 28 new names for 32 old marks

Excellent! But why is # 'bash' rather than 'hash'? I'd be inclined to call either # or % 'hash'.

  • Comment on Re: Almost 28 new names for 32 old marks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Almost 28 new names for 32 old marks (hash)
by tye (Sage) on Jun 12, 2015 at 16:47 UTC
    But why is # 'bash' rather than 'hash'? I'd be inclined to call either # or % 'hash'.

    You nearly answered your own question. 'hash' seemed a bit ambiguous.

    - tye        

      It wouldn't occur to me to call % "hash". It looks more like a sneer to me so sneer is what I call it

      Never got my head round ! as "bang"; it's always been "shriek" to me. I wonder if this is a transatlantic difference or a generational one? Maybe us rightpondians are less familiar with things that go bang than our leftpondian cousins (but let's not go there; it usually ends in tears). What became of "pling" anyway?

      ^ is always "yay" to me as it feels like throwing one's hat in the air.

      Readers not familiar with Glasgow sporting (and other corresponding) loyalties probably won't appreciate \ as "Rangers slash", / as "Celtic slash" and | as "Thistle slash¨.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1130217]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-19 12:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found