Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
Re^8: Is the documentation for Perl 5.20 'pack' correct?by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Jul 07, 2015 at 00:56 UTC ( [id://1133482]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
What an idiot. For the fourth time, go read the damn docs before mouthing off about how they're wrong. And still you are too arrogant to stop and think. I read the documentation before my first post in this thread. It is your entirely consistent, puppy-like, slavish devotion that "the documentation must be right", that won't allow you to see that your interpretation very frequently differs markedly from that the average user's interpretation. You are far from the 'average user'; and so am I. The difference between us is that I can step back from my expertise and apply a little common sense, to see beyond the insider's interpretation; and look for alternate interpretations that can arise from the phraseology. A feat seemingly beyond you. You are without a doubt, the dumbest, smart person I have ever encountered. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
I'm with torvalds on this Agile (and TDD) debunked I told'em LLVM was the way to go. But did they listen!
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|