"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Just curious: is there a BOT that downvotes "me?"by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Jul 15, 2015 at 19:01 UTC ( [id://1134949]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I'd like to apologise. I down-voted your post above; and I regret having done so. At first reading -- scanning really -- I did not recognise the only somewhat familiar piece you were 'paraphrasing', and interpreted it as a 'in support of individual freedoms' and anti-'collective actions' piece. Having re-read it, I think it is in support of the idea that: an individual's freedoms must be curtailed, where their exercise encroaches on or curtails the individual rights of others. I can't give the vote back, nor correct by another upvote; so please accept my apology. Even if I was right originally; and am now mistaking your intent; the fact that I voted on the basis of what I expected from you, rather than what you are actually saying, means that I should not have voted. To that end, I encourage people to downvote (or at least non-vote) this apology. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
I'm with torvalds on this Agile (and TDD) debunked I told'em LLVM was the way to go. But did they listen!
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|