Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
Re: Re: Important Nodes? (change request / suggestion)by azatoth (Curate)
|on Sep 23, 2001 at 19:02 UTC||Need Help??|
Thanks for your reply, bladx. Few remarks :
I may be wrong, but aren't these catagories, already just that, catagories in existence currently?
Yes, they are. I was trying to explain how I personally divided the content of the Monastery into two main categories.
I understand what you are getting at here, but I would think it would be easier for one to point another person in the direction of the powerful Super Search rather than create a section for the "Old Node Wastelands".
I think you misunderstood my inference here - I wasn't suggesting an area called Old Node Wastelands, I was commenting on how many important nodes are sucked up by time, and only revealed to newer users by the grey-haired sages of the monastery.
Hmm, is this a rationale for this whole idea?
Sure, why not.
Thanks for your input, but when reading my posts in future, don't take me too literally. Sometimes I have a way with words that shouldn't be taken at face value :)
Azatoth a.k.a Captain WhiplashMake Your Die Messages Full of Wisdom!
Get YOUR PerlMonks Stagename here!
Want to speak like a Londoner?