Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Cached(?) pages when not-logged-in sometimes appear to be very seriously out-of-date

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on Oct 27, 2015 at 15:58 UTC ( [id://1146128]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Cached(?) pages when not-logged-in sometimes appear to be very seriously out-of-date

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Cached(?) pages when not-logged-in sometimes appear to be very seriously out-of-date
by jdporter (Paladin) on Oct 27, 2015 at 18:35 UTC

    Thanks. It sounds like you've got a protocol which should make it possible to reproduce your observations. Next time you observe the behavior (or this time, if you still have the browser windows open from before), could you please note, and report here, two items of information: (1) the thread (url) where you see the problem happening; and (2) more importantly, the specific comments (by node_id) that appear in the logged-in view of the thread but not in the logged-out view. Just a handful should suffice, if the number of comments in that set is large. Thanks!

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
    foo

      I suspect this is to do with the 'Replies headers depth' & 'Replies text depth' settings.


      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^2: Cached(?) pages when not-logged-in sometimes appear to be very seriously out-of-date
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Oct 27, 2015 at 17:23 UTC

    If this report came from a non-technical user I would be surprised at how good and thorough it was. Since it came from an "experienced" dev who has gotten quite a few pointers about diagnosing things like this more deeply, from me and others here, it is lazy and unhelpful. No timestamps? No browser Ids? No request/response headers or full captures? No internet provider/network info? Nothing new. Nothing for an interested party to dig into.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1146128]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-25 23:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found