Re: side effects "Enforce proper nesting of HTML"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: side effects "Enforce proper nesting of HTML" by LanX (Saint) on Jun 05, 2017 at 10:25 UTC
Shouldn't illegal markup always be rejected? Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^3: side effects "Enforce proper nesting of HTML" by tobyink (Canon) on Jun 05, 2017 at 10:56 UTC
Be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others. —Postel's law	[reply]
Re^4: side effects "Enforce proper nesting of HTML" by LanX (Saint) on Jun 05, 2017 at 11:11 UTC
I should have clarified that my motivation was security not a purist ideology. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^5: side effects "Enforce proper nesting of HTML" (security) by tye (Sage) on Jun 09, 2017 at 06:57 UTC
Re^3: side effects "Enforce proper nesting of HTML" by Lady_Aleena (Priest) on Jun 05, 2017 at 10:32 UTC
I would support it. I would support removing deprecated HTML as well. *No matter how hysterical I get, my problems are not time sensitive. So, relax, have a cookie, and a very nice day!* Lady Aleena	[reply]
Re^4: side effects "Enforce proper nesting of HTML" by LanX (Saint) on Jun 05, 2017 at 11:19 UTC
At the time PM was drafted, HTML was still evolving, so I'm not surprised. Anyway my question was just a question, ie seeking better understanding and not a call for action which needs "support". Not sure if my English is flawed here ... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks