Keep It Simple, Stupid | |
PerlMonks |
Re^10: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habitsby LanX (Saint) |
on Nov 23, 2017 at 17:24 UTC ( [id://1204161]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
There is no religion involved, the rules for posters say "show some effort". It's not the reader who has to put effort into finding out what n/t means. Additionally this is no answer machine, we also write for the archives and want to be searchable. Not criticising him would mean accepting that more and more people just wrote one liner in the title, is this what you want? Anyway I wouldn't have considered him, especially in a ambiguous way between "reap" and "edit". (Consideration is used too often and too sloppy lately) I have the impression some people just downvote because they trust the consideration.
Cheers Rolf
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|