Re^5: Curious about Perl's strengths in 2018

[LanX]

I agree it's complicated and respect your wish to not discuss semantics here.

But that's not what I meant with management.

Function signature would have a bigger positiv impact on beginners than our declarations or defined-or // operators (to name some very popular added features not talking about smart match ~~ )

It doesn't seem like P5P (or whoever else has the final word) does strategical planning.

I'm not attacking you or asking you to invest more.

I'm just stating a lack of market thinking.

[dave_the_m]

It doesn't seem like P5P (or whoever else has the final word) does strategical planning.

Well it doesn't really, because perl is almost entirely a volunteer effort. The pumping could decree that signatures is our highest priority, but if a volunteer decides that doing signatures is too big and complicated and scary and beyond their ability (and it will be but for a small handful of people) and instead it would be fun to implement defined-or, should the pumpkin fire that volunteer or accept the dor patch into core?

Anyway we barely have the manpower to just fix existing bugs, without adding shiny new features.

Dave.

[LanX]

Hi Dave,

Sorry, but calling function signatures a "shiny new feature" in 2018 is a bit weird.

I think this view proves my point of a missing overall strategy.

[dave_the_m]

I think this view proves my point of a missing overall strategy.

But you've completely failed to address where, in my previous post, I pointed out that having a strategy won't help a jot. If you disagree, please clearly explain where my argument falls down.

Dave.