Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)

by misty (Hermit)
on May 17, 2000 at 21:51 UTC ( #12190=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)
in thread how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)

as someone somewhere already suggested, Re(3): or similar would look much better than Re:Re:Re:


Comment on RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)
by BigJoe (Curate) on May 18, 2000 at 05:34 UTC
    Or you could do a RE(username): subject where the user name is the author of the comment you are replying to.
      Your idea has my vote. I like Re(BigJoe): Subject or combining the two, you can do Re(BigJoe,3): Subject

        The title of this node shows how we finally decided to handle this.

        ---
        $world=~s/war/peace/g

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://12190]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (12)
As of 2015-07-31 09:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (276 votes), past polls