Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)

by misty (Hermit)
on May 17, 2000 at 21:51 UTC ( #12190=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)
in thread how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)

as someone somewhere already suggested, Re(3): or similar would look much better than Re:Re:Re:


Comment on RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)
RE: RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)
by BigJoe (Curate) on May 18, 2000 at 05:34 UTC
    Or you could do a RE(username): subject where the user name is the author of the comment you are replying to.
      Your idea has my vote. I like Re(BigJoe): Subject or combining the two, you can do Re(BigJoe,3): Subject

        The title of this node shows how we finally decided to handle this.

        ---
        $world=~s/war/peace/g

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://12190]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-07-29 11:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (216 votes), past polls