rchiav, thank you for the comment revision -- the outline has been updated.
Also, I think beyond the cut and dry "points", there should be a human critique on the style, flow, and as always, what could be better.
I definitely agree there, but believe that such a review should be the responsibility of the author to request or hire someone to do.
The author must take the incentive to build on the basic review we're going to do at no cost for them (but at a cost to us). They'll need to care enough about their own code, reputation, and skill to pursue (and learn from) a thorough code review.
As much as we may like to, we can't do it all for them :)