Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re (tilly) 2: Frivolous function names

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Dec 06, 2001 at 01:00 UTC ( #129752=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Frivolous function names
in thread Frivolous function names

The client did need to know.

There is a sharp distinction between attempting to access things and trying to create/overwrite/modify them. I have a need to expose that distinction.

As for the find/get distinction, I thought about that but decided against it because where get appears elsewhere in this codebase it generally means "fetch" and doesn't autovivify. If you and those around are consistent about it, find/get is a doable proposition, but I don't want to deal with someone in 3 months saying, "Why did it just create that?" and having to say, "Well, didn't you know to use find instead, unlike how it works everywhere else?"

I figure that people won't accidentally summon, and if they do try summoning, they won't be terribly shocked if summoning does something rather different than getting does. (Nor am I terribly shocked at the idea that a summoned thing could have been conjured up out of nothing.)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://129752]
[marto]: Hey there
[Marshall]: hope we get a good answer to Script stopped working... this OP is making serious efforts to solve problem on his own.
[Marshall]: I've become frustrated lately with some OP's.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-03-18 12:53 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (230 votes). Check out past polls.